ZONING VARIANC ES
& HARDSHIPS
HOLD THE LINE ON GRANTING VARIANCES
We need to trust that our Zoning Hearing Board
is standing up for our rights. We expect they will uphold
the laws and
that variances to our codes, regulations & laws will not granted the minute
we are not
looking . The men & women who sit on the Zoning
Hearing Board put in many hours and we need to be glad that
someone is willing to do that - but we also need to ask them to
start holding the line on granting variances giving rights to
some residents while others lose theirs.
The granting of variances becomes a
slippery slope.
If you grant a sign variance for one business, how do you not
allow the next business owner the same privilege? If you grant a
side yard variance for one homeowner, how will you deny the next
homeowner the same privilege? Unfortunately, some of us have
come to realize that the variances already granted are going to
change the nature of our Township. We need to have the
process backed up .
HARDSHIPS
Variances are not supposed to be
granted without hardships. this is supposed to uphold the
integrity of your Township zoning. Hardships are required
to be named in any application for zoning relief. If
hardships are granted with little or no regard to whether a true
hardship exists, it undermines the fabric of your zoning, as one
applicant can refer to another applicants approval to plead for
the same treatment.
EXAMPLE OF "SPOT ZONING " The Baederwood Shopping Center
has been in the throes of decline as the owners there seek in
every way to develop beyond what their current rights allow.
You can read
the entire issue by clicking here. In a nutshell, the
Baederwood Shopping Center owners have about 8 acres of
beautifully green, wooded, sloped land behind them. This
land is zoned R1 - single family residential where each house
would require approximately one acre. But the similar zoning all
around the parcel has been given variances over the years to the
extent that hundreds and hundreds of units were allowed. As of
5-09 the Baederwood owners have hired an attorney to claim that
they deserve the same privilege and say that the law supports
them. The "spot" zoning allowed by our Zoning Hearing Board has
created a challenge to the validity of our ordinance. The owner
suggests the law does not allow us to "re-zone" for one and then
not for another. But is this happening all over the township.
The time for residents to be concerned is now.
EXAMPLE OF SIGN VARIANCES Here and there
throughout the Township there are digital signs appearing. A
large sign with a digital banner presenting
messages to the travelers on York Rd was
installed at Noble Plaza (2007-2008 ) and was promoting an anti-union
message. It was the message that caught everyone's eye.
But the underlying issue here is: how did the large digital sign
get there that required a variance to our sign laws. Were
we notified. Did anyone come? What will result if we allow this
again & again?
Residents of
Abington took their time over the years to protest digital
signs. They wanted their township to look nice and they took the
time to see that codes, regulations and ordinances were passed
to preserve that. The concern over the the variances
issued becomes greater when we see individuals getting exceptions that are
unnecessary, and do not seem to reflect any hardship ---- and
greater still when the people receiving these variances sit on
our Economic Development board, which should hold the
preservation of our character and well- being at the top of its
list.
Without those residents having
taken their own time to protest this sign, which happened
because of the message, and to write about it in the paper, many
of us would never have known even about the variances that were
issued in this case.
Variances do amount to "spot zoning".
And the hardships under which they are granted should be
reviewed carefully and held to the greatest possible standards
for the preservation of the property rights of the owners of all
of the nearby properties as well as for the preservation of our
township into the future.
HERE ARE THE GUIDELINES FOR VARIANCES
Only the zoning hearing board has authority to hear and decide
upon an application for variance from a requirement of the
zoning ordinance. The zoning officer has no power to grant
variances. The governing body has no power to grant variances.
Section 910.2(a) of the MPC contains the criteria for the grant
of a variance. A municipality has no authority to modify these
criteria by different provision in its zoning ordinance. The
zoning hearing board is required to apply these criteria to the
application for variance that has been presented. REQUIREMENTS
FOR A VARIANCE PAGINATOR 15 AT THIS LINK
https://dced.pa.gov/download/Planning%20Series%2007:%20Special%20Exceptions,%20Conditional%20Uses%20and%20Variances/?wpdmdl=59696
The zoning hearing board hears requests for variances where it
is alleged that the provisions of the zoning ordinance, if
strictly applied, would cause unnecessary hardship. The zoning
hearing board may, by rule, prescribe the form of application
and may require preliminary application to the zoning officer.
Although a zoning ordinance is to be liberally construed to
allow for the broadest use of land, an applicant for a variance
bears a heavy legal burden. Section 910.2 of the MPC sets forth
the criteria that must be met for the grant of a variance. The
zoning hearing board may grant a variance provided that it has
made the following findings where relevant in a given case: 1.
That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions
of the zoning ordinance in the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located; The physical circumstances or
conditions that necessitate a variance must be unique to the
property for which application has been made. A physical
circumstance or condition general to the zoning district as a
whole or in a portion of the zoning district in which the
property is located does not warrant the grant of a variance. A
variance is not appropriate merely because the zoning ordinance
is in conflict with the landowner’s desired use of the land. The
circumstances or conditions that necessitate a variance must be
physical in nature. For improved property, unnecessary hardship
unique to the property exists if the property cannot be
conformed to a permitted purpose without extensive demolition or
reconstruction. Goldstein v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Lower Merion,
19 A.3d 565 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009). Except as noted in the
discussions of types of variances below, financial conditions
(economic hardship) may not be considered. 2. That because of
such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no
possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning ordinance and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; 3. That such unnecessary
hardship has not been created by the applicant; 4. That the
variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character
of the neighborhood or district in which the property is
located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate
use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to
public welfare; and 5. That the variance, if authorized, will
represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will
represent the least modification possible of the regulation in
issue. In granting a variance, the zoning hearing board may not
disregard the language of the zoning ordinance under the pretext
of pursuing the spirit of the intended regulation. In granting
any variance, the board may attach such reasonable conditions
and safeguards as it may deem necessary to implement the purpose
of the MPC and the zoning ordinance. It is important to note
that the zoning hearing board may base its variance decision on
only these five findings, and the municipality may not establish
additional criteria. Furthermore, it is important to note that a
variance is appropriate only where the property, not the person,
is subject to hardship
SEE ZONING documents FOR MORE INFORMATION
Our codebook is in 2 parts
Part 1
Township's
Codebook except for zoning
Part 2
Zoning Portion of Township Codebook
or go to
http://www.abingtonpa.gov/info/newcodebook.htm
Please feel free to
send your information to us and please be sure
to tell us about any information you believe to be
incorrect - write
lel@abingtoncitizens.com
|
THE
NEWSLOOP
Sign up here to receive our periodic Newsloop updates on issues that matter to us all.
Knowledge is power. Stay informed to help shape your community and make a difference.
Abington Township, with John Spiegelman in charge, revamped the entire Township website at the end of 2015
and broke all the links to the information we had archived on this site for you.
In 2017, Manager Richard Manfredi arrived and assigned someone not qualified to redo the entire website again.
They not only broke all archived links we had reinstated, but made everything as impossible to find as they could.
Nearly all of our comments and recommedations to fix the Township website have been wholly ignored.
So we do need volunteers to work together helping the Township create a site that is functional and accessible.
We will be reinstating links as we find them....if the data is still available.
So... please let us know if you find a broken link. Send us the URL of the link
and the name of the page it is on, and if we can, we'll reinstate it.
Thanks for the help.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this page or in this site may have unintentional inaccuracies, and also has opinions.
It should not be relied upon as fact until investigated personally by the reader.
Please read our full
Disclaimer
and read our Policies page before using
this site.
All who find inaccuracies are asked to please
contact us so we may correct them.
|