The Abington Citizen's Network

.

HOME
CONTACT US

Signup For
THE NEWSLOOP




HOT ISSUES 

ECON DEVELOPMT CORP 

WATER  QUALITY 

YMCA 

COLONADE 

SOLICITORS AT DOORS

MARCELLUS SHALE/Fracking 

PESTICIDE SPRAYING

WAWA NEAR BAEDER

RED LIGHT CAMERAS

VOTING- ELECTIONS

ST.MICHAEL'S


POLICE MATTTERS
MANOR WOODS / SUMMERFORD
GALMAN Near LENOX RD
FLOODING
BILLBOARDS
COMMERCIALS ON TV
NOBLE TRAIN AREA
BAEDERWOOD SHOP CNTR
FAIRWAY TRANSIT DISTRICT
ZONING REWRITES
YOUR HOUSE RE-ZONED?
ZONING VARIANCES
SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT 
WHERE TO FIND LAWS AND REGS
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION ORDINANCE
MCDONALDS- DUNKIN DONUTS
A PLACE TO MEET
TAX COLLECTION COSTS
YORK RD CORRIDOR PROJEct
ILLEGAL ALIENS
E-VERIFY PROGRAM


and more...
LOST AND FOUND
THE BUDGET PROCESS
THE TAX PROCESS
TAX ABATEMENTS
ZONING &
DEVELOPMENT
HUNTER SOCCER CLUBHOUSE
LORIMOR PONDS ESTATES
RYDAL WATERS
EMINENT DOMAIN IN ROSLYN
TV ACCESS CHANNELS
CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION
WILLIARD COMPLEX IN GLENSIDE
OPEN SPACE
ARDSLEY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
DEER HUNTS IN TOWNSHIP
CELL PHONE TOWERS
CONTRACTORS
TRASH - PAY TO THROW
LITTER 
SCHOOL ISSUES
JOBS FOR OUR KIDS
ANONYMOUS REPORTING
TOOLS FOR RESIDENTS LIKE
WHERE TOFIND LAWS AND REGS


and more...

COMMUNITY GROUPS
ACTIVITIES -EVENTS
TOWNSHIP GOVERNMENT
FIND YOUR COMMISSIONER


and more...

CONTACT US
SITE MAP
INCLUDE YOUR ISSUE
ABOUT THISNETWORK
POLICIES
PRIVACY
DISCLAIMER
REPORT ABUSES
CORRECT AN ERROR
 


 

Regarding Postings:
All views
Pro and Con
including
multiple views
on either side
will be given
equal access
on this site.
 

The Abington Citizens Network
where Abington, PA residents can share ideas and join forces to build a better community
 

 


Public Comment

If there are mistakes here  please let us know so we can correct anything that needs correcting.

 Learn about the policies below this - but first:
       Here's What We Need ( Not What We've Got)

  1)  BE ON A MAIL-PUSH -OUT LIST TO BE NOTIFIED - if we want to know when the Mall Apartment proposal , or the Wawa proposal or  info on Fireworks or  the Economic Development Corporation is coming up at a  meeting agenda or when new documents are posted on the topic, we want to be alerted by email with a link to a single page where the issue is chronicled.  We want there to be push out lists that you can sign up for.

 2) A SINGLE PAGE WITH ITS OWN LINK SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR EACH TOPIC -  currently you can only direct people to some issues by referring them to a page with 24 drop down choices  and then a long scrolling action. Each page, each issue, should have the documents , meeting dates and all chronological information kept on a single page. The link to that page can then be easily shared.

3)  SPEAK AT THE BEGINNING IF WE CHOSE TO
:  if we have children to get home to, or problems sitting for 3 hours just  to address the Board for a mere 3 minutes, this allows us to address the Board and leave. We are happy to be notified when we choose that option that if we wait til it comes up in the agenda, we might learn more before we speak, but that should be our choice not the Commissioners or Managers choice. 

3)  SPEAK ON EITHER AGENDA OR NON AGENDA ITEMS  : if we are speaking at the beginning or the end of the meeting it should be our choice whether we are choosing to speak on agenda items or non-agenda items. After we have seen the action you took on an agenda item, ( perhaps ignoring the pleas of doezens of people who asked you to vote no, then watching you vote yes,for instance)  it is totally appropriate for us to want to comment on the action you just took and for you to understand how your actions affect us.


4) THE SUNSHINE LAW AFFORDS  US A REASONABLE TIME TO SPEAK. Generally three minutes is considered a reasonable time on one agenda item.  However, our commissioners have been giving us just three minutes on, for instance, 25 agenda items, or a 4 or 500 page page budget with new line items never seen before.    Sometimes we do want to speak on three or four of the 25, and we should be able to have the 3 minutes for each item you will vote on - but even if it were reduced to 2 mins per item, that would be an improvement. My recommendation would be 2 minutes on up to four items. Or if you have more than four items you want to speak on one minute per item.  The sunshine law makes it clear that for larger more complicated items like a budget, three minutes is not sufficient time and far more time should be provided depending only on the number of people that appear to want to speak. That is made plain on the Webpage of the Office of Open Records.

5) ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT LEAST A WEEK IN ADVANCE - if they are not, any item that does not have a specific deadline it must meet, should be off until the next meeting by the request  of any residents who felt they did not get  sufficient advance notice. So an item like the August 2020  Public Comment Policy Resolution, that did not have a deadline, would have been put off for a month because residents had been given only three days notice. 

6) THE CONSENT AGENDA SHOULD BE ABOLISHED.  IT IS CONTRARY TO RESIDENT INTERESTS  UNLESS RESIDENTS ARE ALSO GIVEN THE OPTION OF REQUESTING AN ITEM TO COME OFF OF THE CONSENT AGENDA . Residents have a right for items to be fully explained. They may first learn of them when they watch the Committee meeting video - so their first opportunity to speak would be at the Board meeting. They also can require that an item go to a committee meeting rather than be shuffled directly past the committee and to the voting full board meeting .

7) RESIDENTS CAN ADD ITEMS TO THE AGENDA BY PETITION OF 50 RESIDENTS, an item can be added to the agenda, so long as the petition is received by the deadline  required to place items on the agenda

8) COMMISSIONERS MUST ALSO STICK TO FAIRLY SET RULES  REGARDING PUBLIC  COMMENT AND ENGAGEMENT Commissioners must adhere to a proper and well described set of Rules, whether it be Robert's Rules of Order or their own Rules as were once crafted.  Currently they have allowed themselves to officially "sort of " follow some rules, meaning they don't have to follow any ( which is exactly what they are doing) and the Chair is allowed to change the rules at will. There are constant
violations of any proper public engagement  - such as Commissioners taking as much time as they want to "negate" the comments of a speaker, or Commissioners giving one speaker ( that they like ) more time and speakers whose comments they don't like, less. This is neither fair nor legal. And it is detrimental to the residents.

Please ask your Commissioner to get these basic speaking rights in place
___________________________________________________________________________

THE LATEST UNHAPPY ACTION

  9-10-20   A Brand New Public Comment policy Resolution 20-039  came unannounced right out of the blue just  3 days before it was voted on at the 9-10-20 Board of Commissioners meeting.  Touted as an expansion of speaking rights - it was quite the opposite. 
    
             This Public Comment Policy was formulated without any input whatsover from the public and it undid years of what had been worked on to advance public comment on behalf of the residents of Abington Township.

          Richard Manfredi became our manager in 2017, and in that short time the has taken 2 stabs at removing our speaking rights ( both times calling it an "advancement of our rights"  to fool those who did not understand our policies. )   In  January 2018, he said he was adding the consent agaenda - but  there were MANY more measures in there, including taking the rules of away that Commissioners had to follow . He passed all that without any proper announcement, and no committee meeting to vet it. That has been a hallmark of Richard Manfredi’s time at Abington, removing committee meetings and opportunities to speak, and providing shorter than required notice when posting meetings or providing documents.  It is a great disservice to the residents of Abington.
                    

             Another measure that was in this new resolution was that they were allowed to dispose of or discard videos -- and that the minutes alone would be kept as  the official copy of any meeting. That is, of course, absurd especially given the fact that in Abington there are numerous frequent complaints of the minutes not being correct and of residents’  entire appearances at meetings not even being mentioned let alone the content of their comments.  We have many issues that last over years and even over decades where it is important to go back and see what was actually promised Word for Word not in some generalization. 

                Mr. Manfredi tried to explain that only videos that would be made specially and used just to create the minutes could actually be discarded in this manner,  however he has, as of this writing,  refused to show us where the policy is for retention of the main videos, because after a certain time they can be discarded as well, despite the fact that residents want them kept and accessible. But more troubling is the fact that Mr. Manfredi refused to amend the wording even a little bit in order to eliminate the confusion. He seems almost to delight in making things more difficult and more obtuse. 

             And his wording and renaming of things in the Township has been more than slightly problematic.  He often uses two or three different names for the same concept so one is not sure what he is talking about. These are small things but they are all things that are among the traits that make for a good manager, as opposed to one who lets problems persist.  Mr. Manfredi could change this if he wanted to, but he seems to have no desire to do so.

    To have a manager who chooses the least accurate, and often, tragically, false re-creation of a meeting as the "official copy" is also problematic.

     The minutes should be offered only as a helpful summary of a long video,and both versions would be appreciated

      I am still seeking the answer as to whether Mr Manfredi, or his stenograher, Liz Vile, or someone else altered  a recent meeting and eliminated one speaker entirely.  That is one instance of many in this Township.  Mr. Manfredi said that this was a "personnel matter" and we would not learn anything about how it was handled. But because it might have been him who altered it - or asked her to, it is important that we follow up further on this. If it is an employee altering it, they should be dismissed. We cannot allow corruption and complete non transparency  to be the way our Township does business.

SO HERE IS A LIST OF PROBLEMS WITH THIS RESOLUTION:

This Resolution offers no  increased opportunity for participation. That is how it was billed - to fool you.  Our rights in this new Resolution are reduced, plain &  simple 

The Committee of the Whole was "invented", with absolutely no explanation.
Who would put out a document referring to an entity that is completely unknown &  not explain it? No resident could cogently comment about it until they have had time to ask questions and fully understand its function .  No vote should have taken place until residents had a chance to ask questions and get answers. They were given 3 minutes for 16 items - this huge issue being  one of them. This never should have passed in this fashion  with no proper notification, no proper opportunity to understand it , and with NO changes  even made that were suggested. Even rewording the disposal policy that was so poorly worded it did NOT describe what the Manager said he intended. It is ironic that the policy that was said to INCREASE our public comment rights was actually passed by reducing them improperly down to nearly nothing. 

 It is completely unclear how the expanded written comment periods are to work and what the downsides might be. Will all residents be able to see the comments of their fellow residents, for instance? Why has Mr Manfredi ( and Commissioners John Spiegelman, Tom Hecker et al) decided residents should have no right to understand these things before their comments are made.  The one used for the Economic Development Committe was surely not ideal. How will it be fixed?

Rules of Order are not rules at all – they can be broken at any time  at the whim of the presiding officerIt a farcical attempt at pretending there are actual rules to protect residents from improper behavior.  The first statement  of Manfredi's "additional information is that he is  establishing a standard for operations to provide consistency and transparency to the public . Seriously? Where is the consistency when each presiding officer can make up his own rules depending on which side of the bed he woke up on and whom he likes and dislikes and what he likes to hear and doesn't want to hear? He MAY refer to Robert's Rules of Order - Meh. Unless he doesn't want to.  

Residents are forbidden to use the overhead projector
to present documents that both the commissioners and the audience would be able to see, while developers or others with views contrary to the taxpayers who paid for that equipment are allowed free access to it

Residents are not guaranteed answers to questions that they have - a right that we fought years to get and which was removed without any discussion or consultation. The inability to have truthful answers  about the operations of our Township is guaranteed to promote corruption …. In a Township that recently endured (at great, great taxpayer expense), a Grand Jury  investigation with disturbing results and which currently also has a whistleblower suit in full swing, making oversight harder to do can only be imagined is  “for a reason”. 

Residents are able to be banned from  Administrative Information sessions at will… without cause …. whether or not tax monies are used to hold the sessions.  In the past residents who were banned were the only residents that had the documents and had communicated , for instance with EPA and done the work. Residents were told things that were not true.  No residents should be banned from an informational or  government run session. We have a right to see how our tax monies are used and have a right to all have a hand in forming our communities.

Some residents will be allowed to speak longer than the 3 minutes, while others won’t. Others will be strictly held to the 3 minute “rule” – meaning there is no rule at all. The decision is at the whim of the Presiding Officer who may decide if he likes what you are saying or doesn’t.

Regular Sunshine Law violations have been the hallmark of this Board and this Administration .  Not allowing a reasonable amount of time to comment, refusing to recognize residents  rights to interrupt to note a perceived violation of the law, etc.  This suppression of speech is purposeful and intended to prevent citizens  from hearing other citizens or exposing “uncomfortable” facts.  We cannot expect our government to work properly under these circumstances.

A pattern of purposeful egregious behavior  to quickly vote  on measures  that  residents would object to --  like the budget that was decided in five days of having been seen by residents in Nov 2019 … and the Economic Development Corporation that they tried to pass before anyone understood what it even was – and then tried to do again during Covid times. There is a clear pattern in this administration with this manager, this Board and this solicitor.

No adequate time to comment --  a violation of the Sunshine Law.  Our comments are limited to three minutes for this lengthy and complicated resolution  and also for 16 other items at the same time -violation of the sunshine law that requires a reasonable amount of time to comment

Comment is required before any explanation of terms like "Committee of the Whole" can be had or before the consequences of destroying records can be properly discussed. Comment is at the beginning of the meeting with no option to understand what you are commenting on. And our committee meetings where such matters are to be fully vetted were again cancelled for no reason. It is fully ironic that what they were passing was supposedly an increased opportunity to comment and increased information  in issues........   their choice here was to violate all their own rules and give LESS opportunity for that - so they could jam this through.   NIRI

The Resolution should never have been crafted without input from residents.  Residents were never made aware that this was underway nor asked for their concerns about public comment issues. And the Commissioners and Mgr Manfredi are aware that we have MANY.  The effort to bully this through so quickly  shows us the little  regard they hold for our concerns NIRI

Notification was inappropriate
–  residents normally can see agenda items on Friday this was not available  til Mon afternoon. Literally three days before the vote . They violated even the scant courtesy of their own rules  in order to bully this through quickly. NIRI

No time for residents to look up the laws or to alert their fellow residents
--- 20 pages worth to digest in three days.  On a holiday weekend  where families are away and come back to for school. NIRI

If any issue deserved an information session before any vote, it is this issue ….this resolution NIRI

 

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

 

 It should be  “For Discussion Only” at the 9-10-20 meeting.  Any vote taken without proper public participation and input on a matter this important is a violation of the public trust.

 

  Public Comment - 2018

 2020 above appears to be a repeat of the devious tactics that removed many of our our speaking rights shortly after Mgr. Manfredi's arrival - again it ahppened with a false claim of what was being done and  without any proper notification.  It was a loss of many things we had worked hard to get.

In 2018 :  I would dare to say that literally no one knew the Commissioners were revamping your speaking rights when they passed a measure 1-11-18 that took away nearly every rule they were required to follow and tightened restrictions on residents.  They did this on a packed meeting day with no prior Committee meeting, right after the holidays and while everyone was focused on the YMCA and BET's proposal to build on every inch of it .  Manager Manfredi completely misrepresented what they were doing ( knowing that the written details were well buried and most people would'nt understand what was being removed.  Those kinds of actions are exactly why we need better speaking rules ---- and Commissioners that hear us and who are willing to require that their Managers serve our interests!  

  Nearly every other Township has a far better method of interacting with their residents ..... In Abington, we are still fighting for very basic rights.  

         This is being hastily done - I will revise if I can find time.... but here is an idea of  just a few of the things we are asking for --- and have been...for a decade

PLEASE PUT UNDERSTANDING AS A PRIORITY OVER CLOCK WATCHING " or other reasons for curtailment . Allow residents to re-explain what may have been misunderstood or ask for clarifications in a response .  If they did not know an earlier segment was the place to address a concern, allow the concern or comment anyway, and help them understand where it might better have been brought.

PLEASE  AFFORD RESIDENTS A BRIEF ANSWER TO A QUESTION WHENEVER ONE IS KNOWN   and offer a longer or more thorough  answer later  if  one cannot be had during the meeting

PLEASE DO NOT INTERRUPT speakers  :Let them speak as you would like to be allowed to speak- but if they are timed they must be allowed to interrupt an official who might be using up all their speaking time with a longer than necessary answer

PLEASE ELIMINATE THE "SIGN UP FORM"  IN THE LOBBY  - If someone doesn't sign up and then hears something important - the sheet gives the false impression they can't speak unless they signed up.  Instead of the sign up,  have a sheet  instructing residents that there will be a place  where they will be asked for their comments and that they have 3 minutes and that they may comment again at the end on any topic. Let them know they have a guaranteed  right to speak  ( Currently they often don't even see the form, let alone know how to use it .

PLEASE ALLoW RESIDENTS TO COMMENT  AT  THE BEGINNING  OF A MEETING. They should be  allowed their 3 minutes on any, open  topic at the beginning, or at the end  as they see fit. Some have to leave early . If they wish to comment on an item when it comes up for the vote, they can be asked to save theri comment til then - but some may want to leave early.  It is a great disrespect to residents to require them to wait 3 hours to speak to you for 3 minutes.

 

PLEASE ALLOW DISCUSSION - IT IS OFTEN THE KEY TO UNDERSTANDING - most all other township engage in discussion freely with residents. It is vital for understanding. Please stop calling it "debate" and understand that it is part of a healty process.

 

PLEASE  SHOW HOW EACH COMMISSIONER VOTED - a show of hands is the only way we can tell  how our Commissioners are representing us . They should leave them up long enough to know who was aye and who was nay


PLEASE  DO NOT   require residents to  sit down once they ask a question - allow them to hear better  by being closr, see the faces and the lips of those they are dialoguing with  and allow that they may have a clarification if a question or comment has been misunderstood. These things help  prevent misunderstandings 


PLEASE  DO NOT  shorten the brief 3 minutes residents are afforded in any other way - such as by interrupting


PLEASE  DO NOT 
comment in a way that negates or changes speakers remarks  at all  if you are the chair


PLEASE  DO NOT   allow anyone to negate speakers remarks with out offer a brief 30 second rebuttal from the speaker to provide clarity


PLEASE  DO NOT   discredit the speaker - or "undo" their point after they have left the podium
and can no longer speak or offer a rebuttal  ( the chair should never be entering the conversation - if he wants to enter the conversation the co-chair or vice-chair should take the leadership role. .

  PLEASE ALLOW RESIDENTS AT A FULL BOARD MEETING TO ALSO  SPEAK 3 MINUTES AFTER AN AGENDA ITEM IS PRESENTED but before the vote. Residents often first learn about an issue when they see it on tv or hear about it after the Committee meeting. They should not be first hearing about it AFTER their right to speak on it is exhausted.

PLEASE ALLOW RESIDENTS TO RESERVE LEFT OVER TIME -If they have not used their 3 minutes – please allow them briefly back to the podium.

PLEASE ALLOW RESIDENTS TO HAVE OTHER RESIDENTS REPRESENT THEM by reading what they wrote if they are unable to be in attendance.

PLEASE ALLOW A RESIDENT TO APPOINT ANOTHER ABINGTON RESIDENT TO SPEAK FOR THEM if they are also in attendance.

PLEASE GET RID OF THE CONSENT AGENDA -  residents have never been asked if THEY consent to these items being dispensed of with no sunlight on even what the topic is.

COMMISSIONERS & RESIDENTS SHOULD TREAT ONE ANOTHER POLITELY Residents shall be treated with the same courtesy as staff and Commissioners.

PLEASE SEE THAT ANSWERS AND COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS shall not be counted as part of a resident’s time allotment.

PLEASE ALLOW RESIDENTS TO COMPLETE THEIR SENTENCES OR THOUGHTS.

 PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SPEAKING RULES SHEET  a link to the Sunshine Laws, to Robert’s  Rules Of Order, to the Right to Know Laws and information on how to contact Commissioners and staff to obtain information about a matter in the Township.
Please especially include the paragraph that allows a resident the right to bring to the Board’s attention a perceived violation of the Sunshine Act.  Please also include where they can find the video’s agendas and other Public Comment information on the township website

    Some History on the Development of the Current Regulations   ( incomplete - will try to find time soon...)

In 2006, when I first began to come to  the podium, we found that meetings were run with barely a breath in between the "PW1" and "all in favor say aye". residents who had come to a meeting to express their views found that the topic had passed and was voted on before they even knew what was happening, as they were unfamiliar with the agenda and the process.  We took a great deal of time to get that sorted out and finally got them slowed down to the point of asking after each item on the agenda for comments from commissioners and then comments from staff and audience. 

   Speaking time was reduced at 1point to only 3 min. if you come well prepared and knopw that you have to squeeze everything into  3 min. you might do OK . It is sometimes is sufficient to express your view.  But most residents are not prepared to compactly present their case.  And so this has been at times problematic as they are cut off. Or also problematic as some ( who bring up unhappy points ) are cut off  while others ( who praise the commissioners ) are given far more time.  .  Also problematic has been the fact that while residents are cut off from speaking about important items that impact their lives, commissioners give themselves great leeway to speak about nearly any topic they desire including their children's sports events and yes, even sorting socks.  This while people are prevented from discussing in depth flooding and fire safety violations and other serious issues. 

   Eventually, the plan that was set allowed that residents could speak at a Committee  meeting for 3 min. after any agenda item was introduced ( and before the vote ) and also for 3 min. at the end of  each Committee topic on any open issue that was not an agenda item but related to that topic . At full Board Meetings, residents could chose to have 3 minutes of open topic comments either at the beginning or the end of the meeting as well as 3 min. after any agenda item was introduced ( and before the vote ) At one point they also could speak at full Board meetings at the end of each section  with 3 minutes of open comment -- but that right was very soon removed.  Again exceptions are made for some and not granted to others in regard to these rules.

        In  Spring  2012 , new  Manager, Michael Lefevre, proposed  that we move all public comment to the beginning of the meeting and eliminate comment during the rest of the meeting, including on agenda items after Commissioners' discussion showed us what they were intending to do.  Citizens vehemently argued for their right to continue to comment on agenda items before they were voted on and after they learned what the pklan was.   Citizens also asked to have the right to speak before the meeting, but not in conjunction with their other rights taken away as Manager LeFevre was trying to do. The Commissioners did not implement changes at this time

______________________

Some  2012 points as we were formulating new rules

First and foremost - all citizens should know, NO they do not have to SIGN UP to speak.  The sign up sheet has led people to believe that  if they did not sign up, they cannot speak  - and it should be abolished altogether, since half of the residents in a meeting don't even know they just walked past a sign up sheet - or upon which page to write their name.

         Public Comment has been a real political football, with Commissioners actually campaigning on the issue, but then later trying at nearly every opportunity to reduce our rights to speak  unless there is great citizen outcry.  Our speech, especially when televised into many of our fellow residents homes or with a shareable computer link,  is an incredibly valuable tool that each Abington resident should seek to protect and to use.

     As of 9-12, although I have heard that everyone understands the current plan for what is allowed a little differently, it is my understanding that residents can speak in this manner:

They are encouraged to sign up on the sheets in the hall outside the meeting-however , as noted above, residents are not forbidden from speaking because they have not signed up and, in fact, as noted above, the sheets  frequently make things more confusing and I believe they should be abolished for that reason.  The Commissioners or a clerk could simply make understood by a "rule sheet" or orally what the speaking rules are.  They are required per the Sunshine Act  to provide for comment at public meetings.

THE RULES

Residents must state their name and address for the record before speaking ---- Yes, every time they speak.    Residents can speak at a Board of Commissioners meeting for 3 min. after any agenda item  as well as 3 min. at the end of the meeting on any topic.   At one point they were also allowed to speak for  3 min. at the end of  each Committee section .  That was then removed ---  You will see that exceptions are made for some and not granted to others in regard to these rules.

    During Committee meetings, (as opposed to the full Board meetings)  residents are able to speak for 3 min. on each agenda item and are able to speak at the end of the particular Committee segment

The Commissioners are not required to answer you ( which they like to call "debating" when they don't want to answer, but which they gladly do, when they don't mind answering. ) 

   They have also been known to hold up signs indicating  how much of your time is left.  At times, they have done this so frequently during the 3 min period of "selected" speakers that one could only interpret the action as an attempt to  "interrupt the speaker ". They continued the practice even when asked not to do so.  Many residents are quite nervous when speaking in public, and Commissioners, generally are aware of this

Given the above, it would be good for residents to hold small group discussions on  public speaking issues .

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

2014 More rights eroded

 

2016    Commissioners took away more speaking rights . No more comment after each item at Full Board meetings -  Now, if you just learned about an issue when you heard the issue at a Committee meeting on TV , your ability to comment is largely gone

 

2018   Major rights eroded --- Without a proper explanation at all & buried in page 79 of an enormous agenda ( without the summary at top as it usually is )  they passed new and despicable rules . For a year they heard me saying that they had improperly listed speaking rules on the agenda - and not a single Commissioner, manager, staff person or other said to me, "no - they're correct. We changed them when no one was paying attention"  -- and Mr Manfredi  falsely described what they were doing on 1-11-18 when they were changing them . This was incredible decit . I have yet to find a single person who said his or her commissioner alerted them to the upcoming change --- even though they knew we had petitions and passionate testimony the last time they tried that.  
    In fact, what they did is ...they took away all rules that they themselves had to follow - and gave the chair of any meeting tthe right to change any rules or procedures on the fly. That is the wequivalent of have NO RULES at all for themselves - while they increased the restrictions on resident somment .  The only theing ethey had to abide by was the Sunshine act  and the Commonwealth laws - which they are counting on NO RESIDENTS TO KNOW.  And in the first meeting that we learned about this 7-11-19  they violated the Sunshine act . Amazing.

 

_________

   We welcome your comments  to share either anonymously or with your name attached with your  fellow Abington residents.   Send  any updated information, comments or questions  to: lel@abingtoncitizens.com 

 

 

THE NEWSLOOP   Sign up  here to receive our periodic Newsloop updates on issues that matter to us all
      Knowledge is power. Stay informed to help shape your community & make a difference.

 

Abington Township revamped their entire website at the end of 2015.
All links directed to the old site were broken. We will be reinstating links as we find them If the data is still available.
Please let us know if you find a broken link. Send us the URL of the link and the Name of the page it is on, and if we can reinstate it, we will .


DISCLAIMER:

The information on this page or in this site may have unintentional inaccuracies, and also has opinions.
It should not be relied upon as fact until investigated personally by the reader. 
Please read our full  Disclaimer
and read our Policies page before using this site.
 All who find inaccuracies are asked to please contact us so we may correct them.